Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28384

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : UC16 - UC21 Full Version

Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Phenylephrine on the Prevention of Oxytocin Induced Hypotension in Lower Segment Caesarean Section Under Subarachnoid Block: A Randomised Controlled Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62292.18485
Nihar Sharma, Subrat Agarwal, Yogesh Chand Modi, Amit Yadav, Jitendra Yadav, Rashmi Sindhi, Ajay Singh

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. 3rd Year Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. 3rd Year Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 4. 3rd Year Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 5. 3rd Year Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 6. 3rd Year Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 7. 3rd Year Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajastha

Correspondence Address :
Subrat Agarwal,
Flat No-201, Plot No-153, Indra Colony, Banipark, Jhotwara Road, Near Hotel Royal-C.M, Jaipur-302016, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: Drsubrat.agarwal9@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum haemorrhage with an atonic uterus is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality during Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) in nearly 50% of cases. Oxytocin is the most commonly administered drug for achieving post-delivery adequate uterine contractions and placenta expulsion, thereby preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Co-administration of phenylephrine during LSCS under spinal anaesthesia inhibits Oxytocin-induced hypotension.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of co-administration of two different doses of phenylephrine with oxytocin in preventing the incidence of Oxytocin-induced hypotension.

Materials and Methods: A randomised, double-blinded controlled trial was in the Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India from August 2021 to July 2022, involving 120 parturients with American Society of Anaesthelsiologists (ASA) grade second undergoing LSCS under subarachnoid block. They were randomised into three groups: Group A received oxytocin 3U with normal saline, Group B received Oxytocin 3U with Phenylephrine 50 mcg, and Group C received Oxytocin 3U with Phenylephrine 75 mcg administered intravenously over five minutes after the baby’s extraction. The incidence of hypotension, requirement for the total rescue dose of Phenylephrine, and side effects were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square test.

Results: Demographic parameters such as age, height, weight, gestational age, and duration of surgery were comparable in all groups. The incidence of hypotension (Group A (Control): 77.5%, Group B (PE50): 47.5%, Group C (PE75): 22.5%, p<0.001), lowest Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) after Oxytocin infusion (Group A: 67.80±6.16 mmHg, Group B: 68.23±3.96 mmHg, Group C: 72.50±5.87 mmHg, p<0.001), dose of rescue vasopressor requirements (Group A: 75.5±56.61, Group B: 40±50.89, Group C: 17.50±34.99, p<0.001), and incidence of side effects were significantly lower in Group C compared to Group B and Group A.

Conclusion: Compared to Phenylephrine 50 mcg, the co-administration of Phenylephrine 75 mcg with Oxytocin 3U reduces the incidence of Oxytocin-induced hypotension and the need for rescue vasopressors during LSCS under subarachnoid block.

Keywords

Arterial blood pressure, Postpartum haemorrhage, Vasopressor

Maternal hypotension causes various maternal and foetal complications (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6). In parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia, maternal hypotension is primarily caused by a higher level of sympathetic blockade due to the increased spread of local anaesthetic in the cerebrospinal fluid during spinal anaesthesia and by Oxytocin-induced hypotension after the delivery of the baby, resulting from the relaxation of smooth muscles in the arteries caused by Oxytocin (7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12). Prompt treatment with various vasopressors such as phenylephrine, Mephentermine, and Ephedrine, along with fluid co-loading, is the cornerstone in the management of hypotension during LSCS under spinal anaesthesia, as they increase systemic vascular resistance and maintain MAP through vasoconstriction (13),(14),(15). Phenylephrine, a directly acting α-1 adrenergic agonist with a short duration of action, is the first line choice of vasopressor for preventing and treating maternal hypotension in parturients (13),(14),(15). It offers various advantages over other vasopressors, such as better ability to maintain uteroplacental blood flow, better maintenance of MAP during spinal anaesthesia due to its quick peak effect within one minute, absence of foetal acidosis, and suitability in situations where tachycardia is undesirable as it can cause baroreceptor mediated reflex bradycardia and decreased cardiac output (13),(14),(15). When co-administered with Oxytocin in titrated doses as an infusion, Phenylephrine blunts the effects of Oxytocin-induced hypotension and reflex tachycardia (4). Gangadharaiah R et al., compared two different doses of Phenylephrine (50 mcg and 75 mcg) in preventing Oxytocin-induced hypotension in 90 parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia (4). Only a few studies recommend a minimum effective dose of phenylephrine as 75 mcg for co-administration with Oxytocin during LSCS under spinal anaesthesia to prevent Oxytocin-induced hypertension and its other cardiovascular side effects (3),(4),(5),(6),(7). However, further studies are needed to strengthen this hypothesis. The present study aimed to further contribute to the existing literature by demonstrating that the minimum effective dose of phenylephrine for preventing Oxytocin-induced hypotension is 75 mcg, and that co-administration of phenylephrine 75 mcg with Oxytocin 3U more effectively reduces the incidence of Oxytocin-induced hypotension compared to phenylephrine 50 mcg in parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia (4). The current study compares the effectiveness of co-administering two different dosages of phenylephrine with Oxytocin in reducing the incidence of Oxytocin-induced hypotension.

Material and Methods

This randomised double-blinded controlled trial was conducted from August 2021 to July 2022 in the Department of Anaesthesiology at SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC No.-1034/MC/EC/2021) and was registered under the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI No.-CTRI/2022/04/042110).

Inclusion criteria: The study involved a sample of 120 parturients scheduled for elective or semi-elective LSCS, with a body weight between 40 to 70 kg and an age between 18 to 35 years. The participants had to be classified as ASA grade second.

Exclusion criteria: The study excluded parturients who were unwilling to participate, those classified as ASA grade 3rd, 4th, or 5th, individuals with a history of allergic reactions to hyperbaric Bupivacaine or phenylephrine, those with a skin infection at the injection site, individuals with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension (PIH)/eclampsia/preeclampsia, those with a history of blood coagulopathies, and those with hepatorenal impairment.

Sample size calculation: To calculate the sample size and randomise the participants, a total of 40 cases were required in each group. The study aimed to detect a minimum difference of 2 mmHg in the Median Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) between the two groups, with a 95% confidence interval, 80% power, and 0.05 alpha error. The sample collection was performed using a simple random technique through the opaque sealed envelope method (Table/Fig 1).

Study Procedure

In this double-blinding trial, the researcher (an anaesthesiologist) and the patient were both unaware of the specific drug and its quantity being studied. The anaesthesiologist administering the spinal anaesthesia and the one studying the drug’s effects were different individuals.

Group A (Control Group) received 3U of oxytocin and a 10 mL infusion of 0.9% normal saline over five minutes.

Group B (Group PE50) received 3U of oxytocin and a 50 mcg infusion of phenylephrine, diluted to 10 mL normal saline, over five minutes.

Group C (Group PE75) received 3U of oxytocin and a 75 mcg infusion of phenylephrine, diluted to 10 mL normal saline, over five minutes.

After obtaining approval from the research review board and Institutional Ethics Committee, and obtaining informed written consent from the parturients, a detailed preanaesthetic check-up was conducted. The patients were then randomly divided into three equal groups, each comprising 40 parturients, using the opaque sealed envelope method. Upon receiving the patients in the operation theater, monitors were attached, and an 18 G intravenous 17cannula was secured. The cannula was preloaded with Ringer’s lactate solution at a rate of 10 mL/kg of body weight.

All the patients in each group received premedication with intravenous injection of 50 mg ranitidine and 10 mg metoclopramide before the administration of spinal anaesthesia. Patient vitals were recorded just before the induction of spinal anaesthesia. The spinal anaesthesia was administered to the patients in each group while they were in the left lateral position, targeting the L3-L4 space using a 2.2 mL dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a 25 G Quincke spinal needle. The time of induction was noted. Immediately after the induction, the patients were repositioned in the supine position with a wedge placed under the right buttock to achieve a 15-degree tilt. Oxygen inhalation was initiated at a rate of 5 L/min using a simple face mask, and intravenous infusion of Ringer’s lactate solution at 10 mL/min was started and maintained throughout the surgery. Vital signs including Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Heart Rate (HR), and Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) were recorded just after the delivery of the baby, and these readings were considered as the baseline for present study.

Following the delivery of the baby, an infusion of Oxytocin was initiated at a rate of 10 U/hour in 500 mL of Ringer’s lactate solution, which continued until the completion of the surgery. Phenylephrine, either 50 mcg or 75 mcg, diluted in 10 mL of Normal Saline (NS), was administered along with 3U of Oxytocin over a period of five minutes using a syringe pump through a separate intravenous line. In the control group (Group A), patients received an infusion of 3U oxytocin and 10 mL of 0.9% NS over five minutes. In Group PE50 (Group B), patients received an infusion of 3U Oxytocin and phenylephrine 50 mcg, diluted in 10 mL of NS, over five minutes. In Group PE75 (Group C), patients received an infusion of 3U Oxytocin and phenylephrine 75 mcg, diluted in 10 mL of NS, over five minutes.

After the co-administration of intravenous phenylephrine with Oxytocin 3U, intraoperative vitals were recorded at two-minute intervals up to 10 minutes, and then at five-minute intervals until the end of the surgery. If hypotension occurred, it was treated with a 100 mL bolus of intravenous fluid and a rescue dose of 50 mcg of phenylephrine administered intravenously over two minutes. This rescue dose was repeated at two-minute intervals until the MAP increased to within 20% of the baseline value (up to a maximum of four rescue doses of phenylephrine). If the hypotension did not respond to phenylephrine, additional doses of 6 mg of Mephentermine were administered until the MAP was restored to within 20% of the baseline. Hypotension was successfully treated in all patients. The primary measure was the prevention of the incidence of oxytocin-induced hypotension, and the secondary measures included preventing adverse changes in various haemodynamic parameters, including SBP, DBP, HR, MAP, and SpO2, which were associated with oxytocin infusion. The study also aimed to evaluate the requirement for total rescued doses of phenylephrine to prevent the incidence of oxytocin-induced hypotension and to assess the proportion of cases with any side effects in parturients following the administration of oxytocin and phenylephrine.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28.0 (IBM). Descriptive analysis was conducted, presenting categorical variables (qualitative data) as frequencies/percentages using the Chi-square test, and continuous variables (quantitative data) as mean {Standard Deviation (SD)} or median {Interquartile Range (IQR)} using the ANOVA test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

(Table/Fig 2) showed that age, weight, height, mean duration of surgery, mean duration from induction to delivery, and from skin incision to delivery were statistically non significant (p>0.05).

(Table/Fig 3) showed that the mean systolic blood pressure (after delivery of the baby) was statistically significant at 10 minutes to 45 minutes among all three study groups (p<0.001).

(Table/Fig 4) showed that the mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (after delivery of the baby) was statistically significant at 10 minutes to 50 minutes among all three study groups (p<0.001).

(Table/Fig 5) showed that the mean MAP (after delivery of the baby) was statistically significant at 10 minutes to 50 minutes among all three study groups (p<0.001).

(Table/Fig 6) showed that the lowest MAP, as well as the mean time (9 and 10 min) at which the lowest MAP (post-baby extraction) after oxytocin infusion, was statistically significant (p<0.001), although the mean time was statistically non significant (p=0.373) among all three study groups.

(Table/Fig 7) showed that the incidence and total episodes of hypotension in parturients were statistically significant among all three study groups (p<0.05).

The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in Group A (Control, 77.5% {max}) compared to Group B (PE50, 47.5%) and Group C (PE75, 22.5%), respectively. Group A had 28 episodes of hypotension more than Group B and had 46 episodes of hypotension more than Group C. It was observed that Group A (Control) had the highest number of total episodes (60), and Group C (PE75) had the least number of total episodes (14) of hypotension. (Table/Fig 8) showed that the requirement of the total dose of rescue phenylephrine and the mean consumption of rescue phenylephrine were statistically significant among all three study groups.

(Table/Fig 9) showed the mean heart rate (post-delivery of the baby) among all three study groups. It was observed that there was no statistically significant difference between the mean heart rate among all three groups at all time intervals intraoperatively (p>0.05).

Variations in mean heart rate were less than ±10 beats/min at all time intervals among the three study groups, which did not have any clinical significance. (Table/Fig 10) showed the mean oxygen saturation (post-delivery of the baby) among all three study groups. It was observed that there was no statistically significant difference between the mean oxygen saturation among all three groups at all-time intervals intraoperatively (p>0.05). (Table/Fig 11) distribution of the incidence of complications (after delivery of the baby) among the parturients of all groups.

It was observed that there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting and the incidence of shivering among all three study groups (p<0.005). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in Group A (Control, 35%) was significantly higher than in Group B (PE50, 15%) and Group C (PE75, 7.5%) (p<0.005). Nausea and vomiting were both treated with an intravenous injection of ondansetron 4 mg. The incidence of shivering in Group A (Control, 12.5%) was significantly higher than in Group B (PE50, 5%) and Group C (PE75, 2.5%) (p<0.005). Shivering was treated with an intravenous injection of tramadol 50 mg. Bradycardia only occurred in one patient of Group C (PE75) among the parturients of all three study groups.

Discussion

Caesarean sections are commonly performed under single shot spinal anaesthesia (1). Postpartum haemorrhage with atonic uterus is the leading cause of maternal mortality during LSCS under spinal anaesthesia (4). The major problem with the use of Oxytocin is that it causes clinically significant maternal hypotension and reflex tachycardia (3),(4). Phenylephrine, as an infusion, is the vasopressor of choice for the prevention and management of hypotension in parturients during LSCS (4). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and shivering was statistically significant in Group A (Control) compared to Group B (PE50) and Group C (PE75) (p<0.005). However, the incidence of bradycardia only occurred in one patient in Group C (PE75) among all three study groups. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, such as:

Gangadharaiah R et al., compared two different doses of phenylephrine (50 mcg and 75 mcg) on Oxytocin-induced maternal hypotension in 90 parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. They concluded that when combined, oxytocin 3 U and phenylephrine 75 mcg significantly reduce the incidence of oxytocin-induced maternal hypotension during LSCS performed under spinal anaesthesia without producing any unfavourable side effects (4). Jaitawat S et al., compared the effect of administering two different bolus doses of phenylephrine (75 mcg and 100 mcg) for the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension during LSCS under spinal anaesthesia in 120 parturients of ASA grade 1st and 2nd between 18 to 35 years of age. They concluded that prophylactic administration of bolus phenylephrine significantly decreases the incidence of maternal hypotension. A 75 mcg phenylephrine is preferred over 100 mcg phenylephrine, which causes significant bradycardia and reactive hypertension (7). Dokaniya S et al., conducted a prospective randomised double-blinded study to compare the effect of intravenous bolus of phenylephrine, Ephedrine, and Mephentermine for the maintenance of haemodynamic status and its inference on foetal outcome in 60 parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. They concluded that intravenous bolus mephentermine is as effective as phenylephrine and Ephedrine in the prevention of the incidence of maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (5). Chaturvedi NK et al., conducted a randomised single-blinded prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Mephentermine and phenylephrine intravenously for the treatment of hypotension in 40 expectant mothers undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. They concluded that both drugs were comparable in terms of preventing the incidence of maternal hypotension, but phenylephrine had better control over blood pressure maintenance (3).

Rajaram N et al., compared the effect of prophylactic phenylephrine and Ephedrine added to the coloading solution on maternal hypotension, nausea, and vomiting in 100 parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. They concluded that compared to preventive Ephedrine 6 mg, the addition of phenylephrine 100 mcg to the crystalloid solution considerably reduces the risk of maternal hypotension. There was no difference in the maternal heart rate, nausea, and vomiting between the two groups. Comparison of various haemodynamics and other parameters ofpresent study with previous study had been shown in (Table/Fig 12) (1),(3),(4),(5),(6),(11).

Limitation(s)

Haemodynamic changes were assessed using non invasive measurements of SBP, DBP, and MAP. Invasive blood measurements were not performed, which could have shown beat-to-beat variations and provided a more precise demonstration of haemodynamic changes in the three groups.

Conclusion

The prophylactic co-administration of 75 mcg phenylephrine with oxytocin after the delivery of the baby effectively reduced the incidence and episodes of Oxytocin-induced hypotension and the requirement for rescue vasopressors compared to the prophylactic co-administration of 50 mcg phenylephrine with Oxytocin in parturients during LSCS under spinal anaesthesia, without causing any untoward side effects.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to acknowledge all the members of the Department of Anaesthesia, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India for their support.

References

1.
Raja Ram N, Dhar M, Narayan AK, Prakash A, Singh R. Effect of prophylactic Phenylephrine and Ephedrine added to the co-loading solution on maternal hypotension, nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing lower segment caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia in remote Indian island. JOACR. 2020;7(1):158. [crossref]
2.
Patel HSP, Shashank MR, Shivaramu BT. A comparative study of two different intravenous bolus doses of Phenylephrine used prophylactically for preventing hypotension after subarachnoid block in caesarean section. Anaesthesia Essays Res. 2018;12(2):381-85. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Chaturvedi NK, Panigrahi MR, Mukhopadhyay B, Biswas BK. Efficacy and safety of intravenous Phenylephrine and Mephentermine for management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia. A single blind prospective and comparative study among parturients undergoing caesarean section. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia. 2020;7(1):177-81. [crossref]
4.
Gangadharaiah R, Duggappa DR, Kannan S, Lokesh SB, Harsoor K, Sunanda KM, et al. Effect of co-administration of different doses of Phenylephrine with Oxytocin on the prevention of Oxytocin induced hypotension in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised comparative study. IJA. 2017;61(11):60-66. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Dokaniya S, Gurung R, Jain A. Comparison of intravenous bolus Phenylephrine, Ephedrine and Mephentermine for maintenance of hemodynamic status and its effects on fetal outcome during spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section. IAIM. 2019;6(9):28-36.
6.
Das S, Potli S, Madhusudhana R, Krishnamurthy D. A comparative study of Phenylephrine, Ephedrine and Mephentermine for maintenance of arterial blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia under caesarean section. IOSR-JDMS. 2015;14(1):80-85. [e-ISSN: -2279-0853, P-ISSN; 2279-0861].
7.
Jaitawat SS, Partani S, Sharma V, Johri K, Gupta S. Prophylactic administration of two different bolus doses of Phenylephrine for prevention of spinal induced hypotension during caesarean section: A prospective double blinded clinical study. JOACC. 2019;9(2):81-87. [crossref]
8.
Sayyid SSM, Taha SK, Kanazi GE, Aouad MT. Randomised controlled trial of variable rate phenylephrine infusion with rescue phenylephrine bolus versus rescue phenylephrine bolus alone on physician interventions during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery. Anaesthesia Analgesia. IARS. 2014;118(3):611-18. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Agegnehu AF, Gebreegzi AH, Lemma GF, Endalew NS, Gebremedhn EG. Effectiveness of intravenous prophylactic Phenylephrine for the prevention of spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension during caesarean section. A prospective observational study. JOACR. 2017;8(11):02-09. [crossref]
10.
Choudhary M, Bajaj JK. Study to compare the effect of prophylactic doses of 50 mcg/min of Phenylephrine infusion for maternal hypotension and neonatal outcome during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia Essays Res. 2018;12(2):446-51. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Raja SK, Kalapala R, Sarma BA, Kumar SSS. A clinical comparative study to compare the efficacy of Phenylephrine and Mephentermine for management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section. IOSR-JDMS. 2019;18(2):13-18. [e-ISSN: -2279-0853, P-ISSN; 2279-0861].
12.
Puthenveettil N, Sivachalam SN, Rajan S, Paul J, Kumar L. Comparison of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine boluses for the treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section- A randomised controlled trial. IJA. 2019;63(12):43-48. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kumar N, Panigrahi MR, Mukhopadhyay B, Biswas BK. Efficacy and safety of intravenous Phenylephrine and Mephentermine for management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia. A single blind prospective and comparative study among parturients undergoing caesarean section. JOACR. 2020;7(1):177-81. [crossref]
14.
Theodoraki K, Hadzilia S, Valsamidis D, Stamatakis E. Prevention of hypotension during elective caesarean section with a fixed rate prophylactic Norepinephrine Infusion to a fixed rate of prophylactic Phenylephrine infusion: A doubled blinded randomised trial. IJS. 2020;84:41-49. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Hiruthick S, Sanjana KVL. Clinical comparative study to compare the effect of two different doses of Phenylephrine on spinal Induced hypotension during caesarean section. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33(47B):482-89. (Article No. JPRI.75013).[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62292.18485

Date of Submission: Jan 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 25, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 17, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 15, 2023 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com